A quarter (23%) of professional women in the UK with ‘non-white’ sounding names have changed their name to sound more ‘traditionally-British’ in order to get a job, according to a study by, the UK’s only ‘name-blind’ headhunting platform.

It is the first survey (1) of its kind in the UK of professionals who believe they have been discriminated against in the past while job-hunting due to their name (89%) – either on the grounds of gender or ethnicity. It found the incidence of name-changing among professional men was lower than women at one-tenth (9%). However, while 56% of men felt they had been discriminated against due to their ethnicity, nearly four-fifths (78%) of women felt both their gender and ethnicity were barriers to employment.

These findings come after the Cabinet Office announced earlier this year it will initiate ‘name-blind’ recruitment processes for the NHS and Civil Service by 2020. The Prime Minister also made a pledge to end recruitment bias at last year’s Conservative Party conference, in which he referred to a young black woman who had to change her name to ‘Elizabeth’ in order to get a job. However, highlights she is not an isolated case, and estimates approximately 50,300 minorities may have changed their name in the IT and finance sectors alone, 28,300 of them female. (2)

Only 0.3% of the anonymous respondents said they would be willing to speak out publicly on the issue of ‘name-changing’ (please see Kayo Anosike’s story below). Among those who declined to comment, the most common reason provided (62%) was a fear that it would affect their future job prospects.

Nearly all respondents (97%) who did change their name when applying for jobs reported a higher level of call-backs from potential employers relative to their efforts under their legal-name.

Biju Menon, founder of, said: ‘There is an insidious culture of unconscious bias in the corporate world against professionals who are either female, an ethnic minority or both. We believe the problem is most acute in the finance and IT sectors, but it may be more widespread than we originally thought.

‘Employers need to stop paying lip service to the idea of name-blind recruitment and realise unconscious bias is an all-pervasive force in the recruitment sector. Only by recognising it, embracing ethical hiring and removing all reference to names in the recruitment process will we reach a point where no-one will ever have to change their name in order to get a job again.’

Among those who haven’t changed their name, only 13% on average said they would be ‘very likely’ to consider changing it while job-hunting in future. However, nearly a quarter of women (24%) would be ‘very likely’ to do so, in comparison to only 2% of men.

When asked what words remind them of job-hunting, 85% of responses were negative, with ‘stress’ the most common response. Just over a fifth of responses cited ‘bias’ or a derivation.

Responses from’s US platform were more evenly distributed across both genders, with 17% of respondents on average saying they had changed their name in the past. However, a higher overall proportion said they would be ‘very likely’ to change their name in future at 24%. (3)

‘As a society, we need to realise how common unconscious bias is before we can start to tackle it. Only through raising awareness and acknowledging how we unwittingly but constantly “filter” will we be able to address this choke-hold affecting the recruitment of talent. It is high time that we started addressing this “blind spot”, which is causing the need for such extreme practices in order to gain employment in modern society.’

You may also like...

Keep Up To Date - Subscribe To Our Email Newsletter Today

Get the latest industry news direct to your inbox on all your devices.

We may use your information to send you details about goods and services which we feel may be of interest to you. We will process your data in accordance with our Privacy Policy as displayed on our parent website